Modeling and Analysis of the Effects of Government Incentives onto Reduction of Ship Carbon Emission Based on an Improved Principal-agent Model
-
摘要: 目前碳减排激励措施主要考虑碳定价、碳税、船舶航速降低激励等，尚未针对实施碳减排的船公司给予合理补贴激励。由于船公司运行模式、减排思路、资产组成等方面与普通企业的差异，传统委托-代理模型假设无法满足航运业背景下对政府激励效用的需求，需对现有委托-代理模型进行针对性改进。为实现政府以有限基金达到社会效用最大，同时满足船公司付出最优努力获得最大收益，考虑持风险规避态度的船公司碳减排效果外生不确定性，提出船舶碳减排政府激励效用模型，根据政府能否完全观察到船公司的减排努力程度，分别在信息完全与信息不完全条件下，以政府和船公司自身收益效用最大为优化目标，求解政府最优奖惩系数和船公司碳减排最优努力程度，分析政府对船公司进行规制的最优激励合约问题，以及决定船公司碳减排内外部因素的参数对政府给与船公司的最优激励及相关参数的影响。结果表明：最优激励系数伴随外生随机变量方差和绝对风险规避系数的增加而加速下降至缓慢降低，当外生随机变量方差为8和绝对风险规避系数为4时，下降速率趋至平稳，此时，船公司对选择碳减排的风险厌恶程度极高，对实施碳减排的抵制心理十分强烈；成本系数和减排努力水平影响系数同时影响船公司实施碳减排的力度，当减排努力水平较大时，政府的激励随船公司的成本增加呈现先迅速增长后平缓的变化趋势，意味着政府在有限基金内尽可能满足船公司碳减排需求以减少实施难度，但当激励达到一定程度，增加激励不会直接影响船公司碳减排积极性；由于成本系数和减排努力水平影响系数对政府激励效用的共同影响，不同航运市场条件下都将存在1个最优激励，结合长江航运发展背景，当成本系数为0.5且减排努力水平影响系数为3，使得政府激励效用最优。Abstract: Currently, the incentives for carbon emission reduction mainly focus on carbon pricing, carbon taxes, and reduction of ship speed, while there is no subsidy incentives for shipping companies implementing carbon reduction measures. Due to the differences in operational modes, emission reduction strategies, and asset compositions between shipping companies and ordinary enterprises, the assumptions of traditional principal-agent model fail to meet the need to analyze the effect of government incentive onto the shipping industry. Therefore, specific improvements to the existing principalagent models are required. The purpose is to achieve the maximum social benefit with limited government funds, while the shipping companies that make best efforts will receive maximum profits. Considering the exogenous uncertainty of the effect of policies onto carbon reduction for risk-averse shipping companies, a government incentive model for the reduction of ship carbon emission is proposed. Since the government cannot always fully observe the efforts of a shipping company for reducing emissions, the scenarios with complete and incomplete information are independently analyzed. Setting the optimization objectives separately for the government and the shipping companies to maximize their own benefit, the optimal reward-penalty coefficient for the government and the optimal level of efforts for reducing carbon emission from the shipping companies are found. The optimal incentive contract is also studied for the government to regulate the shipping companies. The parameters for internal and external factors determining the efforts for reducing carbon emission by the shipping companies are discussed, as well as their impacts on the optimal incentives provided by the government and the relevant parameters. Study results show that the optimal incentive coefficient decreases at a decreasing rate when the variance of exogenous random variable and the absolute risk aversion coefficient increase. When the variance is 8 and the risk aversion coefficient is 4, the rate of decrease stabilizes. At this point, the shipping companies exhibit a strong aversion to the risks of reducing carbon emission and a strong resistance to implementing the measures. The cost coefficient and the coefficient influencing the level of efforts for reducing emissions jointly affect the intensity of the companies to implement measures. When the level of efforts is high, the government incentives initially increase quickly and then level off as the cost for the shipping companies increase. This implies that the government aims to meet the needs of reducing carbon emission of the shipping companies within its limited funds to reduce difficulties within the implementation. However, once the incentives reach a certain level, further increase in incentive will not directly affect the motivation of shipping companies to reduce emissions. Due to the joint impact of the cost coefficient and the coefficient of the level of effort for emission reduction on the government incentives, there will be one optimal incentive under different shipping market conditions. Considering the development of shipping industry along the Yangtze River, when the cost coefficient is 0.5 and the coefficient of the level of effort for emission reduction is 3, the optimal impact of government incentive is achieved.
-
Key words:
- green shipping /
- carbon emission reduction /
- incentive effect /
- principal-agent model
-
图 1 政府与船公司的博弈关系图
Figure 1. Diagram of the game relationship between government and shipping companies
图 3 激励系数、固定激励基数和最优激励分别与减排努力水平影响系数和成本系数之间的关系
Figure 3. The relationships between the incentive coefficient, the fixed incentive base, and the optimal incentive, and the effort level coefficient of emission reduction and the cost coefficient
表 1 假设参数设置
Table 1. Hypothesis parameter setting
参数 数值 a 1.855 b 1 ρ 0，0.1，…，4.9，5.0 σ2 0，0.001…，9.274，9.275 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 参数设置
Table 2. Parameters setting
参数 数值 a 0，0.01，…，9.99，10 b 0，0.001，…，0.999，1 ρ 2 σ2 1.855 μ 3 360 000元人民币 C0 3 000 000元人民币 η 0
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] MEPC. Resolution MEPC 304(72)Initial IMO strategy on reductionofGHG emissionsfromships[R/OL](. 2018-04)[2022-07-23]. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/GHG-Emissions.aspx .[2] ROMANO A, YANG Z. Decarbonisation of shipping: A state of the art survey for 2000—2020[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2021, 214: 105936. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105936 [3] 闫泽涛. 推进中国经济绿色发展的体系构建[J]. 华东经济管理, 2016, 30(12): 47-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2016.12.008YAN Z T. System construction of promoting the green devel-opment of Chinese economy[J]. East China Economic Management, 2016, 30(12): 47-52. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2016.12.008 [4] 张笛, 赵银祥, 崔一帆, 等. 智能船舶的研究现状可视化分析与发展趋势[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2021, 39(1): 7-16, 34. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2021.01.002ZHANG D, ZHAO Y X, CUI Y F, et al. A visualization analy-sis and development trend of intelligent ship studies[J]. Jour-nal of Transport Information and Safety, 2021, 39(1): 7-16, 34. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2021.01.002 [5] MARC A G. An assessment of carbon pricing effects on international shipping[D]. Singapore: National University of Singapore: 2019. [6] DAN Z G, WANG S A, WANG D Z W. A joint liner ship path, speed and deployment problem under emission reduction measures[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 144: 155-173. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.12.006 [7] ZHAO C P, XU X J, GONG Y, et al. Blue carbon cooperation in the maritime silk road with network game model and simulation[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(10): 2748. doi: 10.3390/su11102748 [8] CHEN K, XIN X, NIU X Y, et al. Coastal transportation sys-tem joint taxation-subsidy emission reduction policy optimization problem[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 247(20): 119096. [9] TANAKA H, OKADA A. Effects of market-based measures on a shipping company: using an optimal control approach for long-term modeling[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2019, 73: 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.01.006 [10] ALI C, PIERRE C. Greening of maritime transportation: a multi-objective optimization approach[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 273(1-2): 501-525. doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2786-2 [11] ZHOU C H, DING Y R, HUANG H X, et al. Meso-level car-bon dioxide emission model based on voyage for inland ships in the Yangtze River[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022(3): 156271. [12] WOO J K, MOON D S H, LAM J S L. The impact of envi-ronmental policy on ports and the associated economic opportunities[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 2018, 110: 234-242. [13] 镇璐, 诸葛丹, 汪小帆. 绿色港口与航运管理研究综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(8): 2037-2050. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL202008010.htmZHEN L, ZHU G D, WANG X F. A review of research on green ports and shipping management[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(8): 2037-2050. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL202008010.htm [14] 桑高峰, 孟燕萍. 碳税政策下港口与船舶减排决策的博弈分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(21): 227-235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2019.21.032SANG G F, MENG Y P. Game analysis of port and ship decisions on emission reduction under carbon tax policy[J]. Sci-ence and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(21): 227-235. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2019.21.032 [15] 王伶俐, 汪传旭, 程琴. 考虑政府补贴和货主低碳偏好的船公司减排决策[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 88-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY202102015.htmWANG L L, WANG C X, CHENG Q. Emission reduction decision of shipping companies considering government subsidies and shippers' lowcarbon preference[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2021, 42(2): 88-95. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY202102015.htm [16] 徐艳, 孟燕萍. 强制减排下政府与港口企业的演化博弈[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2019, 49(9): 762-772. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2019.09.009XU Y, MENG Y P. Evolution game between government and port enterprises under mandatory emission reduction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2019, 49(9): 762-772. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2019.09.009 [17] 高艳艳, 高洁. 地方政府和港口价值共创的演化博弈分析[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 71-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY202201011.htmGAO Y Y, GAO J. Evolutionary game analysis of value co-creation between local government and ports[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2022, 43(1): 71-77. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY202201011.htm [18] ZHUGE D, WANG S A, ZHEN L, et al. Subsidy design in a vessel speed reduction incentive program under government policies[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2021, 68(3): 344-358. doi: 10.1002/nav.21948 [19] 周海英, 张文静. 绿色港口建设下港口与船舶减排决策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(7): 205-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGL202207025.htmZHOU H Y, ZHANG W J. Research on emission reduction decisions of port and ship under the construction of green ports[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(7): 205-214. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGL202207025.htm [20] MENG L P, WANG J M, YAN W, et al. A differential game model for emission reduction decisions between ports and shipping enterprises considering environmental regulations[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 225: 106221. [21] 吴俊妮, 吕靖, 林驿. 基于三阶段博弈模型的船舶使用岸电条件下港口减排策略研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2020, 50(7): 27-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS202007004.htmWU J N, LYU J, LIN Y. Research on port emission reduction strategy for ships using shore power based on three-phase game model[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2020, 50(7): 27-37. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS202007004.htm [22] CUI H, NOTTEBOOM T. Modelling emission control taxes in port areas and port privatization levels in port competition and co-operation sub-games[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 56: 110-128. [23] 郑洋. 基于委托-代理理论的企业节能减排的激励机制研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2016.ZHENG Y. Study of energy saving and emission reduction incentive mechanism based on the agency theory[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2016. (in Chinese) [24] 张帆, 李娜. 基于委托代理理论的碳排放政府规制分析[J]. 贵州省党校学报, 2020, 185(1): 5-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJLL202001002.htmZHANG F, LI N. Analysis of Carbon Emissions Regulation by Government Based on Principal-agent Theory[J]. Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School, 2020, 185(1): 5-10. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJLL202001002.htm [25] 章道云, 田祺, 叶雨薇. 二次成本函数模型及其运用[J]. 中国集体经济, 2013, 374(6): 99-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJTG201306050.htmZHANG D Y, TIAN Q, YE Y W. Quadratic cost function model and its application[J]. China's Collective Economy, 2013, 374(6): 99-100. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJTG201306050.htm [26] TOMASZ D T. Nonlinear dynamics in a heterogeneous duopoly game with adjusting players and diseconomies of scale[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation, 2011, 16(1): 296-308. [27] YIN M, WANG Y, ZHANG Q. Policy implementation barriers and economic analysis of shore power promotion in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87: 102506. [28] 赖单宏, 陈文炜, 黄文焘, 等. 岸电技术经济性分析[J]. 港工技术, 2016, 53(3): 57-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201603015.htmLAI D H, CHEN W W, HUANG W T, et al. Economic analysis of shore power techniques[J]. Port Engineering Technology, 2016, 53(3): 57-62. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201603015.htm [29] 李勇, 张旭, 林朝华, 等. 基于政府补贴政策下的岸电技术经济性分析[J]. 港工技术, 2018, 55(3): 88-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201803023.htmLI Y, ZHANG X, LIN Z H, et al. Technical and economic analysis of shore power based on government subsidy policy[J]. Port Engineering Technology, 2018, 55(3): 88-92. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201803023.htm [30] 赖单宏, 孙启林, 彭灵利, 等. 基于线性阶梯服务费的港口岸电营销方案[J]. 港工技术, 2019, 56(4): 79-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201904018.htmLAI D H, SUN Q L, PENG L L, et al. Port electric marketing scheme based on linear ladder service charge[J]. Port Engineering Technology, 2019, 56(4): 79-82. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAOG201904018.htm -
点击查看大图
图(3) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 544
- HTML全文浏览量: 213
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0